Here’s a video done by Disney back in 1973 on venereal disease.
[tags]Disney, VD[/tags]
The most valuable supply of worthlessness on the web
Information you have no need for. Ever. Usually about me, but possibly about other trivial crap in the world.
Here’s a video done by Disney back in 1973 on venereal disease.
[tags]Disney, VD[/tags]
(via BoingBoing)
Recently the French government, in an unusually intelligent display of government doing the right thing, proposed a law which would require all companies which restrict music portability to license their DRM technologies to any company that wants to build a music player. In response to this, Apple, via Steve Jobs, has criticised the French government, saying this would result in customers filling their iPods with “pirate” music and videos. Of course, Apple does not want to license their DRM, as that would make it possible for other companies to get iTunes protected tunes to play on non-iPod devices. The funny thing is, in 2002 Steve Jobs said consumers needed the right to play any licensed music on whatever device they chose.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs offered a critical view of the recording industry in an interview, following Apple’s acceptance of a technical Grammy award from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences last week. As reported by Don Clark of The Wall Street Journal, Jobs suggested that recording labels need to make it easier for consumers to use their own music however they want.
“If you legally acquire music, you need to have the right to manage it on all other devices that you own,” said Jobs.
So back when iTunes/iPod technologies were starting and not the dominant force, Apple was a consumer advocate saying music legally acquired should be playable on the device of the customers’ choosing. Now, music should be restricted to the device permitted by the music download provider?  Hmmmmm.
[tags]Apple, Steve Jobs, DRM[/tags]
(via BoingBoing)
Marvel and DC comics have tried to jointly trademark the term “Superhero.” Given that this term is used all over the place, and not unique to Marvel and DC comics, this would be a bad trademark, if granted. This is a generic term, and not something that any company or companies should be granted trademark protection on. This week, the LA Times ran an editorial chastizing these companies and the science museum which is involved in this.
In trademark law, the more unusual a term, the more it qualifies for protection. We would have no quarrel with Marvel and DC had they called their superheroes “actosapiens,” then trademarked that. But purely generic terms aren’t entitled to protection, at least in theory. The reason is simple: Trademarks restrict speech, and to put widely used terms under private control is an assault on our language.
Once a trademark is granted, it remains in effect until someone proves to the feds that the term has lost its association with a specific brand, as happened with “cellophane” and “linoleum.” That’s why Johnson & Johnson sells “Band-Aid brand adhesive bandages,” not simply Band-Aids(TM).
[tags]Trademarks, Marvel comics, DC comics[/tags]
(via Snopes)
I just found this whole exchange a bit funny. In an attempt to impose their moral views on others, it seems some in politics are forgetting what they are supposed to be doing. Putting aside my personal opinion on the subject of same-gender marriages, I do expect that a right to marry will eventually be legally guaranteed for same-gender couples. If this indeed is the case, exchanges like the following between Nancy Jacobs, a state senator, and James Raskin, a professor of constitutional law, will eventually be looked back on with a bit of a chuckle, I’m guessing.
“As I read Biblical principles, marriage was intended, ordained and started by God  that is my belief,” [Jacobs] said. “For me, this is an issue solely based on religious principals.”
Raskin shot back that the Bible was also used to uphold now-outlawed statutes banning interracial marriage, and that the constitution should instead be lawmakers’ guiding principle.
“People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution; they don’t put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible,” he said.
Some in the room applauded, which led committee chairman Sen. Brian E. Frosh, a Democrat from Montgomery County, to call for order. “This isn’t a football game,” he said.
Read the whole article at Snopes for details on what set this off. Below is the start of the story, though, to at least show why this conversation occurred.
In February 2006, Baltimore Circuit Court Judge M. Brooke Murdock ruled that a Maryland state law banning same-sex marriages was unconstitutional. In response to that decision, state lawmakers opposed to same-sex marriage introduced a resolution to impeach Judge Murdock (a move which was defeated in the Judiciary Committee) and a bill calling for the amendment of Maryland’s constitution to prohibit all same-sex marriages. Although the bill failed to garner sufficient support for passage, it was reintroduced in a version that would define marriage as a union between a man and a women only but would still allow for civil unions. The latter bill was being debated by a Senate committee on 1 March 2006, when, according to the Baltimore Sun, “Clergy, constitutional law experts and children of gay parents were among those who packed the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee room to speak out on the issue.”
[tags]Snopes, same-gender marriage[/tags]
(via Hack-a-day)
Have you ever wanted to build your own laser listening device so you could act like one of those cool S000per sekrit! spies? Well, here’s your guide. The audio isn’t really that good, but it’s a start. Get one built, and improve it. Also, the original guide used to put together this laser device can be found at this DynDNS site.
[tags]Laser listening, eavesdropping[/tags]
(via CDFreaks)
CHARLOTTE, NC (March 21, 2006) – Verbatim® Corporation, the worldwide leader in CD and DVD media, announced today an exciting new storage solution, the Verbatim16MB FlashDisc™. The innovative FlashDisc is not only a brand new product, it forms the basis for an entirely new flash-based media category. Developed by M-Systems, the Verbatim FlashDisc will be available in April. With an MSRP of only $19.99 for a 3-pack, the new media is set to revolutionize the way consumers, students and office workers exchange photos, music and other digital data files.
Now read that and pay attention. Verbatim wants you to buy 3 USB flash drives with 16 Meg each. You will be expected to pay $20 for them. To some, that might not seem bad. To me, it’s just crazy. But the press release has more of an explanation for the drives:
Verbatim’s FlashDisc is ideal for users who simply want a low-cost way to transport modest-capacity digital files from one computer to another or to share files on a disc that doesn’t necessarily have to be returned. Students can keep multiple FlashDiscs for each class subject and can access the information any time, anywhere. People of all ages can use FlashDiscs to distribute photos or favorite songs to friends and family. Businesses can share data and presentations with colleagues.
In other words, you are expected to swap these USB drives to share data. You should feel like they are inexpensive enough that you won’t care about getting the drive back. And naturally, you’ll buy many 3 packs so you have enough spares to do that. Now for the next kink in what’s wrong with this silly idea, check out what these drives look like.
Now, imagine carrying around half a dozen of these. These drives have a swing-open/click-shut cover for the USB interface, and a big, ugly ring-like plastic cover over the rest of them. Presumably, this is to make us think of these as small discs, instead of overpriced USB drives. But it also makes them big, and not easy to carry around.
I’m constantly amazed at what sells well and what doesn’t. I could be way out of line here, and these might be the next hot thing. But I assure you, I’m not paying $7 for 16 Meg of USB key storage only to give the drive to someone else and not worry about whether or not I get it back. That’s just not sensible.
Be sure to read the entire press release at CDFreaks if you are interested. And feel free to tell me if I’m way off-base here on how these will sell. Maybe everyone else in the world sees sufficient value in these for them to survive, and I’ll be proven wrong once again.
[tags]Verbatim, Dumb consumer devices, USB key[/tags]
This directly from Joystiq. I want to make some comments here, too. I want to try DDO:Stormreach. I’m a longtime D&D gamer, and the thought of teaming online with hopefully easy to assemble teams sounds promising. But I can’t handle the thought of an MMO with almost no single-player content and no reward until quest completion.
I know, MMO is massively multi-player, which many people assumes means you have to team. But I don’t always have the time to wait during team building and then run a full mission/quest. In DDO:Stormreach, you don’t get experience until the end of the mission. That means if I can’t commit to an hour or two, I can’t advance. If I wait for team building, I could easily eat up 30+ minutes of my play time. If the mission takes an hour, I’m usually over my gametime budget then. In DDO:Stormreach, that means I gain nothing.
So DDO:Stormreach is clearly not built for a casual gamer like me. I had a similar problem with Diablo II when it came out. Sometimes, I can go days or weeks with no more than 10-15 minutes play time at any time. In Diablo II, that meant I couldn’t finish the game (and often couldn’t even complete some quests or reach certain checkpoints) until I have a long block of game time available. In DDO:Stormreach that means I shouldn’t even start the game unless I have a long block of time. In Diablo II, at least I earned experience for my game time, so I made some progress in my limited time in game.
Now, having said that, let’s just see a quick blip of what Joystiq showed in their metareview:
Hit the links for more details, and be sure to read the full Joystiq article for their comments, as well.
[tags]DDO, DDO:Stormreach, MMORPG, Dungeons and Dragons Online[/tags]
A gallery of case mods from TechEBlog. Follow the link for more.
[tags]Case Mods, TechEBlog[/tags]
Here’s a video of someone running Half-Life in about 45 minutes. Bunny-hop haters probably won’t want to watch this. Start to finish. Wow.
(via MAKE blog)
The downloadable PDF costs about $9, but you can also get the information for free. Just hit the main page and choose the format you want for your documentation.
It’s constructed of salvaged microwave oven transformers. The solid state SCR module provides power adjustment, unlike the common AC welders which simply switch a multi-tapped transformer.
Here is a photo. As you can see, there are three sections. The bottom section, which is the base of the cabinet, carries the 8 transformers. (Four are visible.) The center section holds the cooling fans, the power controls, and most of the wiring. The top section is the tool tray and carrying handle. (I say ‘carrying handle’ a bit cautiously; this beast weighs 140 pounds!) Scroll down to see the schematic and design notes!
[tags]DIY, arc welder, MAKE[/tags]
Grand scale Lego models are always cool to look at. While you are there, check out the crawling bugs when you mouse over the sidebar buttons. Yes, I’m easily amused.
While catching up with the goings on in the geek world known as the [H]ardForums, I saw this thread about free games. I have so much gaming to catch up on. Things like Halo Zero, Endless Fire, Blitz 1941, and maybe even Princess Maker 2. Of course, I rarely have time to game any more. But there’s always hope for a big lottery winning (guess I need to buy a few tickets some time).
[tags]Free games[/tags]